U.S. Supreme Court Gives Police More Authority to Search People

 

In the recent case of Virginia v. Moore, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the police did not violate the fourth amendment's prohibition against unreasonable search and seizures when they arrested a man in Virginia based upon probable cause but prohibited by Virginia state law.  The Supreme Court also ruled that the police did not violate the fourth amendment when they searched the arrested man and found cocaine.

 

The following synopsis of Virginia v. Moore can be found at Williamette Law Online:

 

"In February 2003 David Moore (Moore) was arrested for driving with a suspended license. Upon a search incident to arrest, police found 16 grams of crack cocaine in his vehicle. Moore filed a pre-trial motion to suppress the evidence discovered during the search, claiming the search violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Under Virginia law, driving without a license is generally not an arrestable offense. Moore argued that because state law only authorized police to issue him a citation, the search of his vehicle was incident to citation, which is not allowed under the Fourth Amendment. The trial court denied Moore’s motion and he was convicted after a bench trial. The Virginia Supreme Court eventually reversed the conviction, adopting Moore’s reasoning that the Fourth Amendment does not permit search incident to a citation. The United States Supreme Court (the Court) reversed, upholding the conviction. The Court determined that the founders' did not intend the Fourth Amendment to incorporate state arrest rules. Balancing the invasion of Moore’s privacy with the promotion of legitimate governmental interests, the Court held Moore’s arrest was constitutionally reasonable because the arresting officer had probable cause."

 

Florida statute section 901.15 governs when the police may arrest a person without a warrant.  In Florida, it is illegal for the police to physically arrest someone for a misdemeanor crime like trespass or shoplifting unless an officer actually sees the crime occurring.  Prior to Virginia v. Moore being decided, evidence seized as a result of an illegal arrest would have (or at least should have) been suppressed (or thrown out of court) by a judge here in Florida.  However, based upon the Supreme Court's ruling in Virginia v. Moore, it appears that that is no longer true.

Share This Blog

HACER UNA PREGUNTA,
DESCRIBE TU SITUACIÓN,
SOLICITA UNA CONSULTA

Llama ahora: (561) 832-4348

Contact Form Sidebar
* Campos RequeridosCampos Requeridos
Su Información Está Segura con Nosotros

Respetamos su privacidad. La información que nos brinda será utilizada para responder sus preguntas o agendar una cita si usted así lo solicita.

Follow Us On

400 Clematis St. Suite 206, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
SI TIENE PREGUNTAS O DESEA AGENDAR UNA CITA PRESIONE AQUÍ PARA LLAMAR AL (561) 832-4348
Desde 1990, el Sr. Chapman ha representado a personas que han sido acusadas de cometer delitos de varios tipos, tales como DUI, violencia doméstica, posesión de armas, posesión de drogas, eliminación de antecedentes penales, infracciones de tránsito, asesinato, homicidio involuntario, abuso infantil, delitos sexuales, abuso de personas mayores, apelaciones y violaciones de libertad condicional.
Abogado de Defensa Criminal en West Palm Beach, FL

© Propiedad Intelectual 2024. Abogado Penalista en Florida. Todos los Derechos Reservados.

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram