Criminal Deportation and a New U.S. Supreme Court Case

          The United States Supreme Court recently decided a case called Padilla v. Kentucky in which the issue was whether Mr. Padilla's lawyer provided him with ineffective assistance of counsel when he failed to tell Padilla that he might be deported from the U.S. after pleading guilty to drug-distribution charges because he was a lawful permanent resident of the United States rather than a naturalized citizen.  According to Padilla, his lawyer told him not to worry about being deported because he had been living in the U.S. for over 40 years.


          The Supreme Court agreed with Padilla that his lawyer's legal representation was constitutionally deficient and provided the following reasons for coming to that conclusion:


          1.  The weight of prevailing professional norms in the legal community supports the view that an attorney must advise her noncitizen client of the risk of deportation if the client pleads guilty to certain criminal charges;


          2.  The Supreme Court has previously recognized the importance to a noncitizen client of preserving his right to remain in the U.S. if he is already here legally;


          3.  The consequences of Padilla's plea bargain could easily have been determined by Padilla's lawyer had he simply read the federal statute pertaining to deportation;


          4.    According to that particular statute, Padilla's deportation was presumptively mandatory if he pled guilty to drug-distribution charges; and


          5.  The legal advice provided by Padilla's attorney was incorrect.


          The Supreme Court continued on to state, however, that in those cases in which the deportation consequences of a plea agreement are unclear, a criminal defense attorney need do no more than advise her client that the pending criminal charges may carry adverse immigration consequences.  But when deportation consequences are clear, as they were in Padilla's case, it is a lawyer's duty to provide correct legal advice to her client.


          If you are not a citizen of the United States and are facing criminal charges, it is essential that you consult with a knowledgeable criminal defense attorney.  To not do so is to run the risk of ending up in the same situation as Mr. Padilla.


          If you would like to learn more about the Padilla decision and its likely impact, you may wish to read an article published by the Immigrant Defense Project entitled "Duty of Criminal Defense Counsel Representing an Immigrant Defendant After Padilla v. Kentucky."

Share This Blog


Llama ahora: (561) 832-4348

Contact Form Sidebar
* Campos RequeridosCampos Requeridos
Su Información Está Segura con Nosotros

Respetamos su privacidad. La información que nos brinda será utilizada para responder sus preguntas o agendar una cita si usted así lo solicita.

Follow Us On

400 Clematis St. Suite 206, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Desde 1990, el Sr. Chapman ha representado a personas que han sido acusadas de cometer delitos de varios tipos, tales como DUI, violencia doméstica, posesión de armas, posesión de drogas, eliminación de antecedentes penales, infracciones de tránsito, asesinato, homicidio involuntario, abuso infantil, delitos sexuales, abuso de personas mayores, apelaciones y violaciones de libertad condicional.
Abogado de Defensa Criminal en West Palm Beach, FL

© Propiedad Intelectual 2024. Abogado Penalista en Florida. Todos los Derechos Reservados.

linkedin facebook pinterest youtube rss twitter instagram facebook-blank rss-blank linkedin-blank pinterest youtube twitter instagram